An insurance provider is implementing Anypoint platform to manage its application infrastructure and is using the customer hosted runtime for its business due to certain financial requirements it must meet. It has built a number of synchronous API's and is currently hosting these on a mule runtime on one server
These applications make use of a number of components including heavy use of object stores and VM queues.
Business has grown rapidly in the last year and the insurance provider is starting to receive reports of reliability issues from its applications.
The DevOps team indicates that the API's are currently handling too many requests and this is over loading the server. The team has also mentioned that there is a significant downtime when the server is down for maintenance.
As an integration architect, which option would you suggest to mitigate these issues?
A. Add a load balancer and add additional servers in a server group configuration
B. Add a load balancer and add additional servers in a cluster configuration
C. Increase physical specifications of server CPU memory and network
D. Change applications by use an event-driven model
Explanation:
To address the reliability and scalability issues faced by the insurance provider, adding a load balancer and configuring additional servers in a cluster configuration is the optimal solution. Here's why:
Load Balancing: Implementing a load balancer will help distribute incoming API requests evenly across multiple servers. This prevents any single server from becoming a bottleneck, thereby improving the overall performance and reliability of the system.
Cluster Configuration: By setting up a cluster configuration, you ensure that multiple servers work together as a single unit. This provides several benefits:
Maintenance: With a cluster configuration, servers can be taken offline for maintenance one at a time without affecting the overall availability of the applications, as the load balancer can redirect traffic to the remaining servers.
VM Queues and Object Stores: In a clustered environment, the use of VM queues and object stores can be more efficiently managed as these resources are distributed across multiple servers, reducing the risk of contention and improving throughput.
References:
MuleSoft Documentation on Clustering: https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/clustering
Best Practices for Scaling Mule Applications: https://blogs.mulesoft.com/dev/mule-dev/mule-4-scaling-applications/
A Mule application uses APIkit for SOAP to implement a SOAP web service. The Mule application has been deployed to a CloudHub worker in a testing environment. The integration testing team wants to use a SOAP client to perform Integration testing. To carry out the integration tests, the integration team must obtain the interface definition for the SOAP web service. What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way for the integration testing team to obtain the interface definition for the deployed SOAP web service in order to perform integration testing with the SOAP client?
A. Retrieve the OpenAPI Specification file(s) from API Manager
B. Retrieve the WSDL file(s) from the deployed Mule application
C. Retrieve the RAML file(s) from the deployed Mule application
D. Retrieve the XML file(s) from Runtime Manager
Explanation:
Reference: [Reference: https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/4.2.x/spring-framework-reference/html/integration-testing.html , , , ]
A manufacturing company is planning to deploy Mule applications to its own Azure Kubernetes Service infrastructure.
The organization wants to make the Mule applications more available and robust by deploying each Mule application to an isolated Mule runtime in a Docker container while managing all the Mule applications from the MuleSoft-hosted control plane.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) choice of runtime plane to meet these organizational requirements?
A. Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition
B. Anypoint Runtime Fabric
C. CloudHub
D. Anypoint Service Mesh
Explanation:
Reference: [Reference: https://blogs.mulesoft.com/dev-guides/how-to-tutorials/anypoint-runtime-fabric/, ]
Organization wants to achieve high availability goal for Mule applications in customer hosted runtime plane. Due to the complexity involved, data cannot be shared among of different instances of same Mule application. What option best suits to this requirement considering high availability is very much critical to the organization?
A. The cluster can be configured
B. Use third party product to implement load balancer
C. High availability can be achieved only in CloudHub
D. Use persistent object store
Explanation
High availability is about up-time of your application
A) High availability can be achieved only in CloudHub isn't correct statement. It can be achieved in customer hosted runtime planes as well
B) An object store is a facility for storing objects in or across Mule applications. Mule runtime engine (Mule) uses object stores to persist data for eventual retrieval. It can be used for disaster recovery but not for High Availability. Using object store can't guarantee that all instances won't go down at once. So not an appropriate choice.
Reference: [Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/mule-object-stores, C) High availability can be achieved by below two models for on-premise MuleSoft implementations., 1) Mule Clustering – Where multiple Mule servers are available within the same cluster environment and the routing of requests will be done by the load balancer. A cluster is a set of up to eight servers that act as a single deployment target and high-availability processing unit. Application instances in a cluster are aware of each other, share common information, and synchronize statuses. If one server fails, another server takes over processing applications. A cluster can run multiple applications. ( refer left half of the diagram), In given scenario, it's mentioned that 'data cannot be shared among of different instances'. So this is not a correct choice., Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/runtime-manager/cluster-about, 2) Load balanced standalone Mule instances – The high availability can be achieved even without cluster, with the usage of third party load balancer pointing requests to different Mule servers. This approach does not share or synchronize data between Mule runtimes. Also high availability achieved as load balanced algorithms can be implemented using external load balancer. ( refer right half of the diagram), Graphical user interface, diagram, application Description automatically generated, ]
An automation engineer needs to write scripts to automate the steps of the API lifecycle, including steps to create, publish, deploy and manage APIs and their implementations in Anypoint Platform. What Anypoint Platform feature can be used to automate the execution of all these actions in scripts in the easiest way without needing to directly invoke the Anypoint Platform REST APIs?
A. Automated Policies in API Manager
B. Runtime Manager agent
C. The Mule Maven Plugin
D. Anypoint CLI
Explanation
Anypoint Platform provides a scripting and command-line tool for both Anypoint Platform and Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition (Anypoint Platform PCE). The command-line interface (CLI) supports both the interactive shell and standard CLI modes and works with: Anypoint Exchange Access management Anypoint Runtime Manager
In a Mule Application, a flow contains two (2) JMS consume operations that are used to connect to a JMS broker and consume messages from two(2) JMS destination. The Mule application then joins the two JMS messages together. The JMS broker does not implement high availability (HA) and periodically experiences scheduled outages of upto 10 mins for routine maintenance. What is the most idiomatic (used for its intented purpose) way to build the mule flow so it can best recover from the expected outages?
A. Configure a reconnection strategy for the JMS connector
B. Enclose the two(2) JMS operation in an Until Successful scope
C. Consider a transaction for the JMS connector
D. Enclose the two(2) JMS operations in a Try scope with an Error Continue error handler
Explanation
When an operation in a Mule application fails to connect to an external server, the default behavior is for the operation to fail immediately and return a connectivity error. You can modify this default behavior by configuring a reconnection strategy for the operation. You can configure a reconnection strategy for an operation either by modifying the operation properties or by modifying the configuration of the global element for the operation. The following are the available reconnection strategies and their behaviors: None Is the default behavior, which immediately returns a connectivity error if the attempt to connect is unsuccessful Standard (reconnect) Sets the number of reconnection attempts and the interval at which to execute them before returning a connectivity error Forever (reconnect-forever) Attempts to reconnect continually at a given interval
According to MuleSoft, which major benefit does a Center for Enablement (C4E) provide for an enterprise and its lines of business?
A. Enabling Edge security between the lines of business and public devices
B. Centralizing project management across the lines of business
C. Centrally managing return on investment (ROI) reporting from lines of business to leadership
D. Accelerating self-service by the lines of business
Explanation:
A Center for Enablement (C4E) provides significant benefits to an enterprise and its lines of business by accelerating self-service capabilities. A C4E is a cross-functional team that promotes the use of best practices, reusable assets, and consistent methodologies across the organization. By enabling lines of business to access and use shared resources, tools, and knowledge independently, a C4E empowers these units to deliver projects faster and more efficiently. This self-service model reduces reliance on central IT for every initiative, fosters innovation, and enhances the overall agility of the organization.
References
MuleSoft Center for Enablement (C4E) Overview
Best Practices for Implementing a C4E on Anypoint Platform
A Center for Enablement (C4E) provides significant benefits by accelerating self-service
capabilities for lines of business. Here’s how:
Self-Service Enablement: C4E empowers lines of business to access, use, and create integrations and APIs independently, without relying heavily on central IT teams.
Guidelines and Standards: The C4E establishes best practices, standards, and reusable frameworks, ensuring that lines of business can develop solutions efficiently and consistently.
Faster Time-to-Market: By enabling self-service, lines of business can rapidly develop and deploy solutions to meet their specific needs, resulting in faster time-to-market for new initiatives.
Reduced Bottlenecks: Self-service reduces dependency on central IT, alleviating potential bottlenecks and allowing IT to focus on governance, security, and strategic projects.
The C4E model thus accelerates innovation and responsiveness within the enterprise.
References:
Center for Enablement (C4E)
Benefits of a C4E
When using Anypoint Platform across various lines of business with their own Anypoint Platform business groups, what configuration of Anypoint Platform is always performed at the organization level as opposed to at the business group level?
A. Environment setup
B. Identity management setup
C. Role and permission setup
D. Dedicated Load Balancer setup
Explanation
* Roles are business group specific. Configure identity management in the Anypoint Platform master organization. As the Anypoint Platform organization administrator, you can configure identity management in Anypoint Platform to set up users for single sign-on (SSO). * Roles and permissions can be set up at business group and organization level also. But Identity Management setup is only done at Organization level * Business groups are self-contained resource groups that contain Anypoint Platform resources such as applications and APIs. Business groups provide a way to separate and control access to Anypoint Platform resources because users have access only to the busine
A Mule application is built to support a local transaction for a series of operations on a single database. The mule application has a Scatter-Gather scope that participates in the local transaction. What is the behavior of the Scatter-Gather when running within this local transaction?
A. Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will result in a roll back of all the database operations
B. Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs sequentially Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back
C. Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs sequentially Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will result in a roll back of all the database operations
D. Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back
Explanation:
Parallel Execution:
Transaction Management:
Error Handling and Rollback:
References:
MuleSoft Documentation on Scatter-Gather
Transaction management in MuleSoft
=========================
As a part of project requirement, client will send a stream of data to mule application. Payload size can vary between 10mb to 5GB. Mule application is required to transform the data and send across multiple sftp servers. Due to the cost cuttings in the organization, mule application can only be allocated one worker with size of 0.2 vCore. As an integration architect , which streaming strategy you would suggest to handle this scenario?
A. In-memory non repeatable stream
B. File based non-repeatable stream
C. In-memory repeatable stream
D. File based repeatable storage
Explanation
As the question says that data needs to be sent across multiple sftp serves , we cannot use non-repeatable streams. The non-repeatable strategy disables repeatable streams, which enables you to read an input stream only once.
You cant use in memory storage because with 0.2 vcore you will get only 1 GB of heap memory. Hence application will error out for file more than 1 GB.
Hence the correct option is file base repeatable stream
An organization is successfully using API led connectivity, however, as the application network grows, all the manually performed tasks to publish share and discover, register, apply policies to, and deploy an API are becoming repetitive pictures driving the organization to automate this process using efficient CI/'CD pipeline. Considering Anypoint platforms capabilities how should the organization approach automating is API lifecycle?
A. Use runtime manager rest apis for API management and mavenforAPI deployment
B. Use Maven with a custom configuration required for the API lifecycle
C. Use Anypoint CLI or Anypoint Platform REST apis with scripting language such as groovy
D. Use Exchange rest api's for API management and MavenforAPI deployment
Explanation:
To automate the API lifecycle in a CI/CD pipeline efficiently, leveraging Anypoint Platform's capabilities is crucial. Anypoint CLI (Command Line Interface) and Anypoint Platform REST APIs provide robust tools for managing various aspects of the API lifecycle, such as publishing, sharing, discovering, registering, applying policies, and deploying APIs. By using these tools with a scripting language like Groovy, you can script and automate these tasks to reduce manual intervention, ensuring consistency and efficiency.
Anypoint CLI allows you to interact with the Anypoint Platform from the command line, enabling automated deployments, management of APIs, and configuration of policies. The Anypoint Platform REST APIs provide comprehensive programmatic access to the platform’s functionalities, allowing for seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. By combining these with a scripting language, you can create scripts that automate repetitive tasks, streamline processes, and ensure that your API lifecycle management is both efficient and reliable.
References:
MuleSoft Documentation on Anypoint CLI
MuleSoft Documentation on Anypoint Platform REST APIs
In which order are the API Client, API Implementation, and API interface components called in a typical REST request?
A. API Client > API implementation > API Interface
B. API interface > API Client > API Implementation
C. API Client > API Interface > API implementation
D. API Implementation > API Interface > API Client
Explanation:
In a typical REST request, the order of interaction is:
API Client: The client initiates the request to access data or functionality exposed by the API.
API Interface: This represents the contract or the definition of the API, often specified in OpenAPI or RAML. It defines the endpoints, request/response formats, and other API details.
API Implementation: This is the actual backend logic that processes the request and returns the response. It interacts with databases, other services, or performs business logic to fulfill the request.
References:
Understanding REST APIs
API Design and Implementation
| Page 4 out of 23 Pages |
| Previous |