Northern Trail Outfitters launches a Partner Community using Salesforce tabs and Visualforce. Opportunities needs to be the selected tab for the Community user. What should Salesforce Admin do to fulfill this request?
A. Set the Opportunity tab as the first tab in the selected tabs in Community Management.
B. Configure Opportunity as the default landing page in Community Settings in Setup.
C. Enable the Opportunity page as the landing page on the Community user guide.
D. Set the Opportunity object page as the landing page in the Community Builder.
Explanation:
When a Community is built using Salesforce Tabs + Visualforce, the configuration is managed through Community Management, not Experience Builder. In this model, tabs represent the primary navigation, and the first tab listed becomes the default landing page for authenticated users.
✅ Why Option A is Correct:
In Community Management → Administration → Tabs, you can select which tabs are visible to users.
The first tab in the list becomes the default landing page when users log in.
To make Opportunities the landing page, simply move the Opportunity tab to the top of the selected tabs list.
🔗 Salesforce Help: Customize Tabs in a Visualforce + Tabs Community
❌ Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
B. Configure Opportunity as the default landing page in Setup
No such setting exists in Setup for tab-based Communities.
C. Enable Opportunity page in user guide
The “user guide” is not a configuration tool—it’s documentation.
D. Set Opportunity object page in Community Builder
Community Builder is used for Lightning template-based Communities, not Visualforce + Tabs Communities.
💡 Real-World Tip
If Northern Trail Outfitters later migrates to a Lightning template, they’ll use Experience Builder to configure landing pages and navigation. But for now, with Visualforce + Tabs, the tab order in Community Management is the key.
When testing the Community, the Salesforce Admin notices that the Knowledge tab is NOT Visible to all partner Community users. What should the Salesforce Admin do to fix this problem?
A. Update the Admin profile so that the Knowledge tab is visible.
B. Add the Global Header permission set to all Community users.
C. Edit the Partner Community profile so that the Knowledge tab is visible.
D. Create a Knowledge article and make it visible to the appropriate channel
Explanation:
To ensure the Knowledge tab is visible to Partner Community users, the Salesforce Admin must:
Edit the Partner Community Profile:
Navigate to Setup → Profiles → Select the Partner Community profile (e.g., "Partner Community User").
Under Tab Settings, set the Knowledge tab to "Default On" or "Tab Visible".
Save the changes.
Verify Additional Settings:
Ensure Knowledge is enabled in the Community (Setup → Knowledge Settings).
Confirm Articles are published to the correct Data Category (if categories are used).
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. "Update the Admin profile":
Admins already have access, but this won’t fix visibility for Partner users.
B. "Global Header permission set":
No such standard permission set exists for Knowledge access.
D. "Create a Knowledge article":
Articles won’t appear if the tab itself is hidden in the profile.
Key Notes:
Data Categories: If Knowledge uses categories, ensure Partner profiles have category assignments.
Lightning vs. Classic: In Lightning Communities, also check App Builder → Navigation Menu for tab visibility.
Reference:
Enable Knowledge in Communities
Configure Profile Tab Visibility
Universal Containers recently rolled out a Community to their partners.
The internal sales team has the following requirements for internal users:
- Ability to support the addition of 50 new partners every month.
- Ability to pass leads to the partners.
- Continue to have access to the leads after transfer to partners.
- Access to the opportunity when the partner converts the lead.
- Leads should be visible to only the partner who is working on the lead; other partners should NOT have access to the lead.
Which sharing option should the Salesforce Admin choose to meet the requirement for internal users?
A. Create a sharing rule to share leads and opportunities to internal users.
B. Use sharing sets to share leads and opportunity to internal users.
C. Create a public group and include partners and share records to the public group using sharing rules.
D. Allow partner users to manually share the leads and opportunities with internal users
Explanation:
Universal Containers needs internal sales team members to access Leads and Opportunities in a Partner Community while restricting Lead visibility to only the assigned partner.
A. Create a sharing rule (Correct): Use a sharing rule to grant internal users (e.g., via a public group) access to Leads and Opportunities owned by partner users. Set OWD for Leads and Opportunities to Private, ensuring only the assigned partner sees their Leads, while sharing rules provide internal users ongoing access. This is scalable for 50 new partners monthly.
B. Use sharing sets (Incorrect): Sharing sets are for external users, not internal users.
C. Public group with partners (Incorrect): Including partners in the group would allow all partners to see all Leads, violating the requirement.
D. Manual sharing by partners (Incorrect): Manual sharing is not scalable for frequent partner additions and relies on partner action.
References:
Salesforce Documentation: Sharing Rules
Trailhead: Data Security for Experience Cloud
Your company is using the Napili template and is expanding internationally and now requires your Community to support multiple languages what steps should you take to support this in your community?
A. Multiple community languages are not supported5. Enable the Language Picker in the Community Builder and select the supported languages in Community Settings
B. Select the available languages in the Setup Menu and drag the Language Picker onto the Community Template
C. Enable Community Language Picker in the setup menu and select the supported languages in the Community Builder
D. Enable the Language Picker in the Community Builder. Salesforce will automatically present a list of supported languages
Explanation:
To support multiple languages in a Napili (Customer Service) template-based Experience Cloud site, Salesforce provides multi-language support, but it requires explicit setup in both:
Salesforce Setup – to define which languages are supported
Community Builder – to enable language switching with a Language Picker component
✅ Steps to Enable Multilingual Support
Go to Setup → Language Settings
Add and activate the languages you want to support (e.g., French, German, Spanish).
These must be enabled at the org level first.
Go to Experience Builder (formerly Community Builder)
From Settings → Languages, select which of the org-enabled languages you want to support in the Community.
Add translations for labels, page content, articles, etc., using the Translation Workbench.
Drag the Language Picker component
From the component panel in Builder, drag “Language Picker” to your Community header or other layout area.
This allows users to manually select their preferred language.
📘 References:
Salesforce Help: Multilingual Experience Cloud Sites
Translation Workbench Overview
❌ Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
A. Multiple community languages are not supported
Incorrect — Salesforce does support multilingual communities using the Translation Workbench and Language Picker.
C. Enable Community Language Picker in the setup menu...
There is no setting in Setup called “Community Language Picker” — it’s enabled and configured in Community Builder, not Setup.
D. Salesforce will automatically present a list of supported languages
Salesforce does not auto-activate languages — you must enable them in Setup, then configure them in Builder.
✅ Summary
To support multiple languages in a Napili template Community:
✅ Enable languages in Setup, then
✅ Drag the Language Picker into the Community via Builder (Option B)
The headphones alliance wish to engage with their customers in a whole new way and at Dreamforce they saw Communities in action. They have identified that they have a lot of great content but what to make sure that articles and discussions are grouped logically so that it is easy to find, post questions and navigate the site. What Communities feature would you recommend to use?
A. Data Categories
B. Topics
C. Chatter Groups
D. Article Groups
E. Knowledge Groups
Explanation:
B. Topics: are a core feature of Salesforce Experience Cloud (formerly Community Cloud) designed precisely for content organization and discovery. They allow you to categorize various types of content, including Salesforce Knowledge articles and Chatter discussions (feed posts), under common themes. When topics are enabled, community members can follow topics, view all content related to a specific topic, and even assign topics to their own questions and posts. This creates a highly intuitive and navigable structure that helps users easily find relevant information and discussions, addressing the Headphones Alliance's need for logical grouping and simplified navigation.
Reference: Salesforce Help documentation, such as "Organize Experience Cloud Sites with Topics" (help.salesforce.com), explicitly details how topics are used to connect and categorize content across a community for better navigation and engagement. It highlights their ability to link articles, questions, and other feed items.
Let's quickly review why the other options are not the best fit:
A. Data Categories: Data Categories are primarily used for organizing Salesforce Knowledge articles. While they provide a hierarchical structure for knowledge, their main function often involves controlling article visibility and access, rather than serving as a general content grouping and navigation tool for both articles and discussions across the entire community. They are more about behind-the-scenes organization and access control for knowledge.
Reference: Salesforce Help documentation on "Work with Data Categories" (help.salesforce.com) emphasizes their role in classifying and securing access to knowledge articles.
C. Chatter Groups: Chatter Groups are designed for specific user cohorts to collaborate and discuss within a dedicated space. While they host discussions, they are not intended for broad, site-wide content categorization that encompasses articles and provides universal navigation. They are more for focused collaboration than general content discovery.
Reference: Salesforce Help documentation on "Work in Chatter Groups" (help.salesforce.com) describes their function for team and group-based collaboration and information sharing.
D. Article Groups & E. Knowledge Groups: These are not standard, out-of-the-box features in Salesforce Experience Cloud that serve the described purpose of grouping both articles and discussions for overall site navigation. Salesforce Knowledge uses Data Categories for organizing articles, but "Article Groups" or "Knowledge Groups" as a standalone, comprehensive content organization and navigation feature for a community are not recognized functionalities.
Northern Trail Outfitters uses Knowledge Articles to address customer questions in their Customer Service (Napili) Template-based Community. They need to know if these Articles are helpful to customers when they search for help in the Community. What is the most efficient way for a Salesforce Admin to get this information from customers?
A. Redirect customers to a survey form in an external website that captures their comments on the Knowledge Article.
B. Create a customer survey using custom Lightning components and add it to the homepage.
C. Build a custom Community page that shows the Knowledge Article and have custom fields to capture customer comments.
D. Enable the article voting property on the Article Content component in the article detail page in the Community Builder.
Explanation:
The article voting property in Salesforce Experience Cloud (formerly Community Cloud) allows customers to provide feedback on Knowledge Articles directly within the community by indicating whether an article was helpful (e.g., thumbs up/down or a similar voting mechanism). This feature is built into the Article Content component in the Community Builder (now called Experience Builder for the Napili template) and is the most efficient way for a Salesforce Admin to gather feedback because it:
Leverages Native Functionality: Article voting is a standard, declarative feature that requires minimal setup and no custom development, aligning with the principle of using out-of-the-box Salesforce tools for efficiency.
Direct Feedback Collection: Customers can provide feedback immediately after reading an article, ensuring high response rates and relevant, context-specific input.
Ease of Analysis: Voting data is automatically tracked in Salesforce, and admins can view metrics (e.g., percentage of “helpful” votes) through reports or dashboards in Experience Cloud Analytics, making it easy to assess article effectiveness.
Seamless User Experience: The voting feature is embedded in the article detail page, requiring no additional navigation or external tools, which reduces friction for customers.
Scalability: This method scales across all Knowledge Articles in the community without requiring individual page customizations or external integrations.
Implementation Steps:
Access Experience Builder: In the Salesforce Experience Workspaces, navigate to the Experience Builder for the Customer Service (Napili) Community.
Configure the Article Content Component: On the article detail page, locate the Article Content component and enable the voting property (e.g., “Show Voting” or “Enable Feedback”). This typically involves checking a box in the component’s settings to display thumbs up/down or a similar voting option.
Publish Changes: Save and publish the updated community configuration.
Monitor Feedback: Use Experience Cloud Analytics or create a custom report on Knowledge Article votes (e.g., KnowledgeArticleVoteStat object) to track how many users found articles helpful or unhelpful.
Analyze and Act: Review voting data to identify low-performing articles and update content as needed to improve helpfulness.
Why Not the Other Options?
Let’s evaluate why the other options are less efficient:
A. Redirect customers to a survey form on an external website:
Drawbacks: Redirecting users to an external website introduces friction, as customers must leave the community, potentially reducing response rates. It also requires integration with an external tool, which adds complexity, maintenance, and potential costs. Additionally, capturing and syncing data back to Salesforce for analysis is less seamless than native voting.
Inefficiency: This approach involves external system setup and integration, which is more time-consuming than enabling a built-in feature.
B. Create a customer survey using custom Lightning components and add it to the homepage:
Drawbacks: Building custom Lightning components requires development effort, which is less efficient than using a native feature. Placing the survey on the homepage may not capture article-specific feedback, as users may not associate the survey with the article they read. This approach also risks lower engagement if users don’t notice or interact with the survey.
Inefficiency: Custom development increases implementation time and maintenance compared to enabling a declarative feature like article voting.
C. Build a custom Community page that shows the Knowledge Article and have custom fields to capture customer comments:
Drawbacks: Creating a custom community page with custom fields for comments requires significant configuration or development effort, including designing new page layouts and potentially custom objects or fields. While comments provide detailed feedback, they are harder to analyze at scale compared to simple voting metrics. This approach also risks lower participation, as writing comments is more effort than clicking a vote.
Inefficiency: The time and resources needed to build and maintain a custom page outweigh the simplicity of enabling article voting.
Why Article Voting is Most Efficient:
Time and Resource Savings: Enabling article voting is a quick, declarative configuration that requires no coding or external tools, making it ideal for a Salesforce Admin with limited development resources.
Direct Relevance: Voting is tied directly to each Knowledge Article, ensuring feedback is specific and actionable.
User-Friendly: Customers can provide feedback with a single click, increasing participation compared to surveys or comment fields.
Built-In Analytics: Salesforce tracks voting data natively, allowing admins to create reports or dashboards (e.g., in Experience Cloud Analytics) to monitor article performance without additional setup.
Reference:
Salesforce Help Documentation: The Salesforce Help article on “Knowledge in Experience Cloud” details how to enable article voting in the Article Content component. It explains that enabling voting allows community users to indicate whether articles are helpful, with data stored for analysis (Salesforce Help: Knowledge Article Voting).
Trailhead Module: The “Experience Cloud Basics” and “Knowledge Basics” modules on Trailhead cover configuring Knowledge Articles in communities, including enabling feedback mechanisms like voting to gauge article effectiveness.
Exam Relevance: The Salesforce Experience Cloud Consultant Exam Guide includes the “Analytics” (5%) and “Community Setup” (18%) sections, which test knowledge of tracking community engagement and configuring features like article voting. Practice questions on platforms like Focus on Force often include scenarios about collecting user feedback, emphasizing native features like voting for efficiency.
Web Source: A blog post on Salesforce certification tips (e.g., from Focus on Force) highlights using standard features like article voting to meet business requirements efficiently, as custom solutions are often less favored in exam scenarios unless explicitly required.
Example Scenario:
NTO’s community has a Knowledge Article titled “How to Pair Bluetooth Headphones.” After enabling the article voting property, customers who read the article see a “Was this helpful?” prompt with thumbs up/down options. If 80% of users vote “thumbs up,” NTO can confirm the article is helpful. If another article, “Troubleshooting Audio Issues,” receives mostly “thumbs down,” NTO can prioritize updating it. The admin creates a report on article votes to track trends, all without leaving Salesforce or building custom components.
Final Answer:
D. Enable the article voting property on the Article Content component in the article detail page in the Community Builder is the most efficient way for a Salesforce Admin to gather feedback on whether Knowledge Articles are helpful to customers in NTO’s Customer Service (Napili) Community.
What must your enable at the User level to ensure External Users are able to view Knowledge?
A. Check Knowledge Use
B. Check the Data Categories you want to be Visible
C. Assign the Knowledge User Permission Set
D. Assign the Knowledge One Permission Set
E. Check KnowledgeOne User
Explanation:
The Knowledge One Permission Set grants External Users (e.g., those with Customer Community or Partner Community licenses) read-only access to Salesforce Knowledge Articles in an Experience Cloud site. This is a standard, declarative solution that aligns with Salesforce’s licensing model and security best practices for external users, ensuring they can view articles without needing a full Knowledge User license, which is designed for internal users who manage articles.
Why It Works:
Permission Granting: The Knowledge One Permission Set includes “Read” access to Knowledge Articles, enabling external users to view them in the community.
Efficiency: It’s a pre-built permission set, requiring no custom development, and can be assigned to user profiles or individual users via Setup.
Scalability: Works across all community users with compatible licenses (e.g., Customer Community, Customer Community Plus, Partner Community).
User Experience: Seamlessly integrates with the Experience Cloud site, allowing users to access articles via the Knowledge component without additional navigation.
Implementation:
In Setup, go to Permission Sets and locate “Knowledge One.”
Assign it to the external users’ profiles (e.g., Customer Community) or individual users.
Ensure Knowledge is enabled in the community (via Experience Builder) and articles are shared appropriately (e.g., via Data Categories or sharing rules).
Test by logging in as an external user to confirm article visibility.
Why Not the Other Options?
A. Check Knowledge Use: Incorrect. No “Knowledge Use” checkbox exists. The “Knowledge User” checkbox is for internal users managing articles, requiring a costly license unsuitable for external users.
B. Check Data Categories: Incorrect. Data Categories control article visibility at the role/profile level, not the user level, and require prior Knowledge access permissions (e.g., via Knowledge One).
C. Assign Knowledge User Permission Set: Incorrect. This is for internal users managing Knowledge, not external users viewing articles, and requires a full Knowledge license.
E. Check KnowledgeOne User: Incorrect. No “KnowledgeOne User” checkbox exists in Salesforce; this is a misnomer for the Knowledge One Permission Set.
References:
Salesforce Help: “Set Up Salesforce Knowledge in Experience Cloud” explains that the Knowledge One Permission Set grants external users access to Knowledge Articles (Salesforce Help: Knowledge One Permission Set, accessed July 2025).
Trailhead: The “Experience Cloud Basics” module details configuring Knowledge for external users, emphasizing the Knowledge One Permission Set (Trailhead: Experience Cloud Basics).
Example:
For Northern Trail Outfitters, an admin assigns the Knowledge One Permission Set to the Customer Community profile. Customers can then view articles like “Product Setup Guide” in the community, with visibility restricted by Data Categories (e.g., “Customer Support”).
Universal Containers have launched their Customer Community on the Koa template. Community members have asked your advice for accessing the community on iOS devices, what do you recommend?
A. IOS users should download the Salesforce1 app and access the community through the Salesforce1 switcher
B. All users should access a Koa Community via a Desktop browser only
C. IOS users should download the OneCommunity app where they can use their regular community login credentials to access the Community
D. Navigate to the community URL in the browser and a mobile experience will be automatically rendered
Explanation:
Why “D” Is Correct
Koa is fully responsive out‑of‑the‑box. All standard Salesforce Experience Cloud templates—including Koa—are built on a responsive framework that automatically adapts the layout and navigation for phones and tablets. Community members simply open the community’s URL in their iOS browser (Safari or Chrome), and the site detects the device and renders a touch‑optimized experience—no extra app download required.
Salesforce Help on Templates:
“Experience Cloud templates let you build responsive sites for delivering rich, branded spaces for your customers and partners.”
Mobile Strategy Guidance:
“Over half of customer interactions happen over mobile devices. … having a mobile‑responsive site isn’t an option anymore, it’s a necessity.”
Why the Other Options Don’t Apply
A. Salesforce1 app switcher:
While Communities can be accessed via the Salesforce mobile app, requiring users to install Salesforce1 adds friction and is unnecessary for Koa’s built‑in responsive design.
B. Desktop browser only:
Koa explicitly supports mobile; disabling mobile access would contradict Salesforce’s guidance and disadvantage a majority of users.
C. OneCommunity app:
“OneCommunity” is not a standard Salesforce app. There is no out‑of‑the‑box “OneCommunity” mobile app for Koa sites.
Universal Containers built a Community using the Customer Service Template. They want the Salesforce Admin to enable multilingual support for their Community. Where can the Salesforce Admin configure the languages supported by this community?
A. Community Settings
B. Community Builder
C. Force.com Sites
D. Site.com Studio
Explanation:
The correct place for a Salesforce Admin to configure the languages supported by a Community (Experience Cloud site) is within the B. Community Builder.
Here's a breakdown:
B. Community Builder: This is the primary interface for designing, building, and managing Experience Cloud sites. Within the Community Builder, there's a dedicated section (usually under "Settings" or represented by a globe icon) where you can:
Set the default language for the community.
Add additional languages that the community will support.
Configure fallback languages (what language to display if a translation isn't available for the user's selected language).
Manage exporting and importing translations for site content.
Add a Language Selector component to pages so users can switch languages.
This is the central place to enable and manage the multilingual capabilities of the community's interface and static content.
Let's quickly look at why the other options are not correct for this specific task:
A. Community Settings: While there are "Community Settings" in Salesforce Setup (under Digital Experiences > All Sites), these typically cover broader site-wide configurations like status, name, URL, and general preferences, but not the detailed language management for multilingual support within the site's content and UI. The granular language configuration is done in the builder.
C. Force.com Sites: Force.com Sites (now often referred to as Salesforce Sites) is an older feature primarily used for building public websites or exposing Visualforce pages without requiring login. While it underpins some aspects of Experience Cloud, it's not the interface used for managing multilingual support within a template-based Experience Cloud community.
D. Site.com Studio: Site.com Studio was a separate product from Salesforce for building public websites with a drag-and-drop interface. It is distinct from Experience Cloud and is no longer actively developed or recommended for new community implementations.
In summary: For enabling and configuring multilingual support for a Customer Service Template-based community, the Salesforce Admin will spend most of their time in the Community Builder.
Reference: Salesforce Help documentation, specifically articles like "Create a Multilingual Site" or "Set Language Options" within the "Experience Cloud" section, consistently point to the Experience Builder (Community Builder) as the place to configure languages for your site.
Universal Containers creates a Community for their end users to access invoices. The invoice pages are mobile of responsive and utilize rich text styling for the amount totals in each column. Mobile access to these invoices is important. The API Enabled profile permission has been turned on to allow Salesforce mobile access to external users with Communities licenses. Which characteristic of this Community will cause display problems when accessed from an Android mobile device?
A. 'API enabled' profile permission
B. Mobile responsiveness
C. Community URL access
D. Rich text styling
Explanation:
Why Option D?
Rich Text Styling Often Causes Mobile Display Issues
Rich text formatting (bold, colors, custom fonts) in Salesforce does not always render consistently on mobile browsers (Android/iOS).
Mobile devices may ignore or misalign styled columns, breaking the invoice layout.
Mobile Responsiveness (Option B) is Not the Issue
If the pages are properly responsive (as stated), they should adapt to screen size. The problem is content-specific (rich text).
API Enabled (Option A) and Community URL (Option C) Are Irrelevant
API Enabled allows API access (e.g., for Salesforce Mobile App), but does not affect visual rendering.
Community URL access works fine on mobile (as Koa/Napili templates are responsive).
Why This Matters for Android?
Android’s default browsers (Chrome, Samsung Internet) handle HTML/CSS differently than desktop.
Rich text tables may:
Overflow screen boundaries.
Lose alignment (e.g., currency symbols misaligned with amounts).
Fail to respect font sizes.
Solution:
Replace rich text with standard HTML tables or Lightning Design System (SLDS) components.
Test invoices on real Android devices (not just emulators).
Reference:
Salesforce Rich Text Limitations
Mobile Best Practices for Communities
Key Takeaway:
Rich text (D) is the most likely culprit for Android display issues.
Fix by simplifying formatting or using mobile-optimized components.
It's been a long and exciting week of developing your new Customer Community, so exciting in fact you just removed the Administrator profile from the Selected Community Profiles and can no longer access the Community. What should you do next?
A. Create a case with Salesforce support
B. Disable the community and reactivate it as this automatically adds the Administrator Profile
C. Perform Community Membership updates using the API
D. Go into Setup >> Community Settings and Select >> Apply default access settings
Explanation:
When the Administrator profile is removed from the Selected Community Profiles, the admin can no longer access the community’s settings (e.g., Experience Builder or Workspaces). However, the admin retains access to the Salesforce org via Setup. Using the API (e.g., REST API with the NetworkMemberGroup object), the admin can programmatically reassign the Administrator profile to the community’s membership, restoring access. This is the most direct and efficient solution, as it leverages Salesforce’s programmatic capabilities without requiring external intervention or unnecessary actions.
Why Not the Other Options?
A. Create a case with Salesforce Support: Unnecessary, as the admin can resolve this within the org using the API. Support is for platform issues, not configuration errors.
B. Disable the community and reactivate it: Incorrect, as deactivation/reactivation does not automatically restore the Administrator profile to the community’s membership.
D. Go into Setup >> Community Settings and Select >> Apply default access settings: Incorrect, as no such “Apply default access settings” option exists, and the admin cannot access community settings due to the profile removal.
Implementation:
Use an API tool (e.g., Workbench) to log in to Salesforce.
Query the Network object to find the community’s ID (SELECT Id FROM Network WHERE Name = 'Your Community Name').
Create a NetworkMemberGroup record to add the Administrator profile (find its ID via Setup > Profiles) to the community.
Verify access by logging into the community.
References:
Salesforce Help: “Manage Members in Experience Cloud Sites” notes that APIs like NetworkMemberGroup can update community membership (Salesforce Help: Manage Community Members, accessed July 2025).
Trailhead: “Experience Cloud Basics” covers resolving membership issues via API (Trailhead: Experience Cloud Basics).
Final Answer:
C. Perform Community Membership updates using the API is the next step to restore access to the Customer Community.
Universal Containers has a multi -layered distribution structure. The Main Distributors in each geography work with Regional Distributors to sell and service customers in the region. Universal Containers plans to roll out a Community with the following capabilities:
• Main Distributors and Regional Distributors are considered Partner accounts in Salesforce.
• Main Distributors can communicate with other Main Distributors.
• Regional Distributors can communicate with other Regional Distributors who are managed by the same Main Distributor, but NOT with other Regional Distributors.
How should the Salesforce Admin build a Community to meet the requirements?
A. Allow Main Distributors to be members of two Communities: one for Main Distributors and one for the Regional Distributors that they manage
B. Build one Community using the Napili template for Main Distributors and Regional Distributors. Disable Community user visibility and allow portal user visibility
C. Create a Community for each Main Distributor. Allow Regional Distributors to log in to the Community
D. Build one Community for each Regional Distributor and one for Main Distributors
Explanation:
The most effective way for the Salesforce Admin to build a Community to meet these requirements is:
B. Build one Community using the Napili template for Main Distributors and Regional Distributors. Disable Community user visibility and allow portal user visibility.
Let's break down why this is the best solution and why the others fall short:
Understanding the Requirements:
Main Distributors (MDs) & Regional Distributors (RDs) are Partner Accounts: This means they will be partner users with Partner Community licenses.
MDs communicate with other MDs: This implies a peer-to-peer communication model among Main Distributors, regardless of their managing Regional Distributors.
RDs communicate with RDs managed by the same MD, but NOT with other RDs: This is the crucial part. It implies a hierarchical communication structure where RDs can see their "sibling" RDs under the same Main Distributor, but not RDs from other Main Distributor hierarchies.
Why B is the Best Solution:
One Community, Napili Template (or any modern Experience Cloud template): This is the standard and most scalable approach for managing a large partner network. Creating multiple communities (options C and D) leads to significant administrative overhead, inconsistent branding, and fragmented data.
Disable Community user visibility: This is a key setting found under Sharing Settings (Organization-Wide Defaults) in Salesforce Setup. When enabled, "Community User Visibility" (or "Portal User Visibility" as it was sometimes referred to) allows users within the same community to see and interact with each other (e.g., in Chatter feeds, member lists). By disabling this, you prevent all external users in the community from seeing each other by default. This is the first step to enforcing the communication restrictions.
Allow portal user visibility (and then use Sharing Rules/Sharing Sets/Role Hierarchy for granular control): Once general community user visibility is off, you then leverage Salesforce's robust sharing model to open up specific visibility as required:
Main Distributors communicating with other Main Distributors: This can be achieved through Chatter Groups where only MDs are members, or through sharing rules/sharing sets that grant visibility to other MD records. Since they are at the top of the partner account hierarchy, their roles will likely roll up to a higher level, making peer-to-peer sharing easier to configure.
Regional Distributors communicating with other Regional Distributors managed by the same Main Distributor: This is where Role Hierarchy for Partner Users becomes critical. When you enable partner users, Salesforce automatically creates a role hierarchy for each partner account (e.g., "Main Distributor Partner Executive," "Regional Distributor Partner Manager," "Regional Distributor Partner User"). By default, users can see data owned by or shared with users below them in the role hierarchy. To enable RDs under the same MD to communicate, you'd ensure their roles are under the same MD's role in the hierarchy, and then potentially use Sharing Sets or Sharing Rules based on account or role to allow RDs under the same Main Distributor to see each other's posts or profiles. The "Disable Community user visibility" setting acts as a baseline, and then sharing rules open up visibility where needed.
Why other options are not optimal:
A. Allow Main Distributors to be members of two Communities: one for Main Distributors and one for the Regional Distributors that they manage: This creates an unnecessary administrative burden. A single Partner Community can handle multiple partner tiers and their specific communication needs through proper sharing settings and group configurations. Users generally should not need to switch between communities to perform their regular duties if all partners are part of the same overall distribution network.
C. Create a Community for each Main Distributor. Allow Regional Distributors to log in to the Community: This is highly inefficient and creates an unmanageable number of communities. Each Main Distributor would have their own isolated community, preventing Main Distributors from communicating with other Main Distributors (unless they are members of multiple, separate communities, which is still inefficient). It also complicates cross-organizational reporting and management.
D. Build one Community for each Regional Distributor and one for Main Distributors: This is even more fragmented than option C. Creating a separate community for each Regional Distributor is completely unscalable and would be an administrative nightmare. It would severely limit communication and collaboration.
Conclusion:
In conclusion: A single Partner Community, combined with judicious use of the "Community User Visibility" setting (disabling it by default and then opening up specific visibility via sharing rules, sharing sets, and leveraging the partner role hierarchy), is the most robust and scalable way to meet Universal Containers' complex multi-layered distribution structure requirements.
Reference:
Salesforce Help: "Control User Visibility in Your Experience Cloud Site" (This is crucial for understanding how to restrict default visibility and then open it up selectively).
Salesforce Help: "Partner User Roles" (Explains the hierarchical nature of partner roles and how they impact sharing).
Salesforce Help: "Sharing Sets" and "Sharing Rules" (Key tools for extending record and user visibility for external users based on account or user criteria).
| Page 2 out of 24 Pages |
| Previous |