Which actions can be completed in the Qualification area of the supplier 360 view? Note: There are 2 correct answer to this question
A. View the current status of qualifications started for the supplier.
B. Start the requalification process for disqualified and expired categories.
C. Review approval comments for the supplier’s registration.
D. Add a preferred category status for an existing qualification.
Explanation:
The Qualification area in the Supplier 360° view is the central workspace for managing a supplier’s category-specific qualifications (e.g., "IT Hardware", "Facilities Services") within the Supplier Lifecycle process.
A is correct – View the current status of qualifications started for the supplier.
This area displays a list or dashboard of all qualification projects associated with the supplier, showing each one’s current status (e.g., In Progress, Qualified, Expired, Disqualified), enabling quick status tracking.
B is correct – Start the requalification process for disqualified and expired categories.
For categories where a supplier’s qualification has expired or been disqualified, the Qualification area provides an action (e.g., "Requalify" or "Start New Qualification") to initiate a new qualification project for that category, restarting the evaluation process.
Why C and D are incorrect:
C is incorrect – Review approval comments for the supplier’s registration.
Registration approval comments are part of the Supplier Registration workflow, not category qualification. These are viewed in the Registration or Overview section of the Supplier 360, not within the dedicated Qualification area.
D is incorrect – Add a preferred category status for an existing qualification.
Preferred Supplier status is a segmentation attribute typically managed in the Supplier Segmentation or Supplier Master area, not within the Qualification workspace. The Qualification area focuses on compliance/eligibility status (Qualified/Not Qualified), not commercial segmentation like "Preferred."
Reference:
These functions are outlined in the SAP Ariba Supplier Management user guide under “Working with Supplier Qualifications” or “Using the Supplier 360° View.” The Qualification section is specifically for tracking and initiating category-based qualification projects.
Which is a benefit of using pre-grading in Supplier Performance Management projects?
A. Increases the amount of automation in the SPM process
B. Enables the Target Grade option
C. Allows for weight values higher than 100
D. Allows team members to provide grading input on survey responses
Explanation:
Pre-grading automates the calculation of KPI scores based directly on quantitative responses from surveys or integrated data sources. By defining grading scales (e.g., 95–100% = "A") in the KPI setup, the system automatically assigns grades/scores without manual evaluator intervention. This increases process automation, reduces subjective bias, speeds up evaluation, and ensures consistency.
Why other options are incorrect:
B (Enables the Target Grade option):
Target Grade is a separate configuration used for comparison against actual scores. It functions independently of pre-grading.
C (Allows weight values higher than 100):
Weighting is configured in the scorecard structure. Total category weights typically sum to 100%; pre-grading does not affect weighting rules.
D (Allows team members to provide grading input):
This describes collaborative grading or manual evaluation, which is the opposite of pre-grading. Pre-grading automates scoring, reducing manual input.
Reference:
SAP Ariba SPM documentation on “Configuring KPIs and Grading” explains that pre-grading automates score calculation from survey data, enhancing efficiency and standardization.
Which attributes of Importance should be considered when creating a scoring structure within a survey? Note: There are 2 correct answer to this question
A. The value defines a question’s relative importance within a section.
B. Team graders can adjust the value while reviewing responses.
C. The total of all Importance values must add up to 100.
D. Acceptable values range between 0 and 10.
On which elements of the engagement is the Residual Risk field in the engagement summary based?
A. Grades submitted on risk assessment questionnaires
B. Answer: to the inherent risk screening questionnaire
C. Issues created during the engagement request process
D. Controls triggered during the engagement request process
Your customer wants to classify performance tier levels for easy reporting. Which option would you recommend?
A. Add a question to the supplier request template.
B. Create a custom field on the Supplier Performance Management project layout.
C. Create a supplier registration project.
D. Create a supplier qualification project.
The Evidence Collection and Risk Control Effectiveness Review phases do not contain any tasks in the supplier risk engagement project template. Which action initiates these phases?
A. Reviewing the inherent screening questionnaire and approving the request
B. Sending assessment questionnaires to recipients in the previous phase
C. Creating a new issue for the engagement request
D. Clicking the Begin Review button on the engagement summary
You configure a template to appear for region: Germany and commodities: homeopathic practice or medical practice. How can you create a visibility condition to achieve this result?
A. Create a field match for region and apply the IS EQUAL TO operator for Germany. Apply a subcondition with the ALL OF operator with commodity IS EQUAL to homeopathic practice and commodity IS EQUAL TO medical practice.
B. Create a field match for region and apply the IS EQUAL TO operator for Germany. Apply subcondition with the ALL OF operator with commodity IS IN LIST homeopathic practice and commodity IS IN LIST medical practice.
C. Create a field match for region is equal to Germany. Apply a subcondition with the ANY OF operator with commodity IS EQUAL to homeopathic practice and commodity IS EQUAL TO medical practice.
D. Create a field match for region and apply the IS EQUAL TO operator for Germany. Apply a subcondition with the NONE OF operator with commodity IS EQUAL to homeopathic practice and commodity IS EQUAL TO medical practice.
Which of the following is a characteristic of a simple workflow in a control-based engagement risk assessment project?
A. All assessments are sent to recipients at the same time.
B. Assessments are reviewed through a single approval task.
C. Issues are automatically created for all active controls.
D. Owners can choose the recipient for each assessment.
The business details questionnaire requires questions of types Commodity, Region, and Department. Which functionalities are dependent upon these questions? Note: There are 2 correct answer to this question
A. Triggering the appearance of content in the inherent risk screening questionnaire.
B. Controlling members of project groups on the Team tab when using buyer category assignments.
C. Limiting supplier invitations and preventing award to high-risk suppliers in SAP Ariba Sourcing events.
D. Automatically calculating the inherent risk score for the project based on answer to the questions.
Which action is part of an advanced approval flow?
A. Associate a folder containing multiple documents with the approval task.
B. Use the approval rule editor to add conditions to approval nodes.
C. Specify project groups in the reviewer’s field of the task.
D. Enable the “repeat for each document draft” setting.
You configure the supplier database field mappings and want confirmation that a field has been mapped correctly. What action would you take to validate field mapping entries?
A. Enable synching between SAP ERP and SAP Ariba.
B. Select the answer type.
C. Click the Apply Field Restrictions button.
D. Enter a value for validation pattern.
Which solution from the SAP Ariba Supplier Management Portfolio is unavailable for customers that currently subscribe to SAP Ariba Supplier Information and Performance Management?
A. SAP Ariba Network Supplier Services
B. SAP Ariba Supplier Lifecycle and Performance
C. SAP Ariba Supplier Risk
D. SAP Ariba Supply Chain Collaboration for Buyers
| Page 2 out of 7 Pages |
| Previous |