Free 2V0-13.25 Practice Test Questions 2026

Explanation:

Option B – Approval Policy
Approval policies ensure that requests meet company requirements prior to deployment for certain users. When a user submits a deployment request, an approval policy can require one or more designated approvers to review and approve the request before any resources are provisioned. This directly addresses the requirement for pre-deployment compliance checking. Approval policies can be configured to trigger only for specific users, groups, or projects.

Option C – Resource Quota Policy
Resource quota policies limit the total active resource consumption per VCF Automation user. A quota policy defines maximum limits for CPU, memory, storage, and instance counts that a user or project can consume across all active deployments. Once the quota is reached, the user cannot request additional resources until existing deployments are deleted or the quota is increased. This directly meets the requirement to limit consumption per user.
The requirement to "maintain existing process for virtual machine deployments" is addressed by upgrading the existing fleet management instance, not by a specific policy type.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – IaaS Policy
IaaS policies enforce technical constraints at the infrastructure layer, such as requiring specific storage classes or VM classes. While they can validate certain aspects of a deployment, they do not provide approval workflows or per-user consumption limits. IaaS policies are more about technical compliance than governance approval.

Option D – Deployment Limit Policy
Deployment limit policies restrict resource usage on deployments created from specific cloud templates. They are template-scoped and do not provide per-user consumption limits across all deployments, nor do they provide pre-deployment approval workflows.

Option E – Lease Policy
Lease policies define how long a deployment can exist before automatic expiration and deletion. They manage time-based resource reclamation but do not limit total active consumption per user nor provide pre-deployment approvals.

References

Broadcom TechDocs – Approval Policies in VCF Automation – Pre-deployment approval workflows for compliance checking

Broadcom TechDocs – Resource Quota Policies – Per-user and per-project limits on CPU, memory, storage, and instances

Explanation:

Option F – Deploy VCF Operations for logs in a High Availability model.
This meets the 99.9% availability requirement. The HA model is a three-node cluster behind an internal load balancer, providing application-level resilience plus vSphere HA and DRS protection . A Simple (single-node) model would create a single point of failure, violating the availability SLA.

Option D – Configure the integration for VCF Operations and VCF Operations for logs.
This meets the single pane of glass requirement. VCF Operations centrally manages log collection across all VCF components, and integration with VCF Operations for logs is required to enable diagnostic findings, centralized log analysis, and unified troubleshooting . Without this integration, logs and metrics remain in separate silos.

Option B – Configure the integration for VCF Operations and VCF Automation.
This provides visibility into VCF Automation components. The VCF Operations for logs collects logs from VCF Automation for VM Apps Organization using the CASAdapter, which is required to generate diagnostic findings for automation-related issues . This ensures complete coverage across all infrastructure components.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A
– Configure VCF Operations for logs to capture events from only VCF Management components. This violates the requirement to capture events from all infrastructure components of the VCF fleet. The solution must include VI workload domains, NSX, vSAN, and other components, not just management .

Option C
– Deploy VCF Operations for logs in a Simple model. A simple (single-node) deployment lacks high availability. If the single node fails, log collection stops entirely, failing the 99.9% availability SLA .

Option E
– Configure VCF Operations for logs to capture events from all VCF infrastructure components. While this statement is technically correct for log collection scope, it is not a separate design decision that needs to be made. This capability is automatically enabled when you deploy the HA model (Option F) and configure the integration (Option D). The exam asks for three distinct decisions the architect should make.

References

Broadcom TechDocs – High Availability VCF Operations for Logs Model – Three-node cluster with load balancer provides HA

Broadcom TechDocs – Centralized Log Collection Architecture – Integration between VCF Operations and VCF Operations for logs

Explanation:

Why Option B is Correct

The customer has two requirements:
Existing stretched cluster model must be used (vSAN stretched cluster across two sites)
Minimize management infrastructure downtime

The Single Management Zone Supervisor deployment with HA control plane supports this design for the following reasons:

In a stretched cluster configuration, vCenter Server and the Supervisor control plane VMs are deployed on the stretched cluster itself. The Single Management Zone model means all control plane VMs reside in a single availability zone (typically the preferred site), while the HA control plane ensures that control plane VMs are distributed across multiple hosts within that zone. This provides high availability against host failures while remaining compatible with the stretched cluster constraint.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – Three Management Zone Supervisor deployment with HA control plane
While this provides excellent availability, it is unnecessary and adds complexity. The Three Management Zone model is designed for environments requiring maximum fault tolerance across three failure domains. The customer's existing stretched cluster has only two sites (zones), not three. Deploying a three-zone Supervisor on a two-site stretched cluster is not supported or practical.

Option C – Three Management Zone deployment with Simple Availability control plane
This option fails both requirements: the three-zone model is incompatible with a two-site stretched cluster, and the Simple (non-HA) control plane does not minimize downtime.

Option D – Single Management Zone deployment with Simple Availability control plane
While the Single Management Zone model is compatible with stretched clusters, the Simple Availability control plane provides no high availability. A single control plane VM failure would disrupt management operations, violating the requirement to minimize downtime.

References

Broadcom TechDocs – Supervisor Deployment Models – Single Management Zone with HA control plane is supported on stretched clusters

VCF 9.0 Stretched Cluster Design Guide – Control plane placement and HA requirements for minimizing downtime

Explanation:

Why Option C is Correct
The customer requires dedicated external network access for each tenant while minimizing the number of NSX Edge clusters. The Full Services VPC model normally requires Edge nodes for routing. VRF Lite solves this conflict by providing routing isolation within a single Edge cluster. Each tenant receives a logically separate routing table and gateway that shares the same parent Tier-0 Gateway and Edge nodes. This gives tenants dedicated external access without deploying additional Edge clusters.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – Deploy maximum 10 NSX Edges into a single Edge cluster.
Adding more Edge nodes does not provide tenant-dedicated external access. The Full Services Model requires only two Edge nodes (Active/Standby). Maximum deployment adds unnecessary hardware without enabling tenant isolation.

Option B – Install two NSX bare metal Edges with multiple physical interfaces.
Physical interface separation does not create logical routing isolation. Two Edge nodes cannot provide dedicated external access for multiple tenants simultaneously, and this approach does not scale.

Option D – Use NSX Federation with dedicated NSX instance per tenant.
This violates minimizing Edge clusters. Deploying separate NSX instances per tenant dramatically increases infrastructure footprint and operational complexity, the opposite of what the customer requires.

References

Broadcom TechDocs – VPC with Full Services Workload Networking Model – VRFs provide dedicated external access without dedicated Edge nodes

Digital Thought Disruption– VCF 9 NSX Deep Dive – Native VRF-Lite support for tenant isolation

Explanation:

According to the official VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documentation, a VKS cluster includes components spanning four functional areas: authentication and authorization, storage integration, pod networking, and load balancing

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Identity federation, persistent logging, firewall services, monitoring
These are optional Standard Packages (e.g., Fluent Bit for logging, Istio for firewall policies), not core components every VKS cluster provides.

B. Authentication, external storage, VM networking, DNS services
"External storage" is inaccurate—VKS uses native vSphere CSI with CNS. VM networking is handled by pod networking, not separate VM networking. DNS services are not a core cluster component.

C. Authorization, backup services, VLAN segmentation, DHCP
Backup services (Velero) and VLAN segmentation are optional add-ons, not core. DHCP is handled by underlying NSX/vSphere networking, not a VKS cluster component.

References

Broadcom TechDocs – VKS Architecture: "The components that run in a VKS cluster span four areas: Authentication and authorization, storage integration, pod networking, and load balancing"

VMware Blogs – VKS Core Packages: Core packages include Pinniped (auth), auth-service, vSphere CSI, Antrea/Calico CNI, and vSphere CPI (load balancer)

Explanation:

Option A – Configure one vSphere Distributed Switch for ESX Management, Storage, and vMotion traffic.
This groups all infrastructure traffic types onto one vDS, which then uses physical uplinks connected only to Zone 1. This satisfies the requirement that Management and Storage traffic remain within Zone 1.

Option B – Configure one vSphere Distributed Switch for all workload traffic and all NSX - Host and Edge TEP/Edge Uplinks
This places workload VM traffic plus NSX overlay tunnel traffic onto the second vDS, which uses physical uplinks connected only to Zone 2. This satisfies the requirement that Workload traffic remain within Zone 2.

Why Other Options are Incorrect


C. One vDS for ESX Management, Storage, vMotion, and NSX TEPs
This mixes Zone 1 traffic (Management/Storage) with Zone 2 traffic (NSX TEPs) on the same switch and uplinks, violating the security policy that requires physical separation and prevents servers from connecting to multiple zones via one interface.

D. One vDS for all workload traffic and all NSX TEPs
While workload traffic and NSX TEPs can share a switch (both in Zone 2), this option is incomplete because it omits the second switch required for Zone 1 traffic. The question asks for two additional decisions to complement the stated two-switch design.

E. One vDS for all storage traffic
Storage traffic is a subset of Zone 1 and must be grouped with ESX Management and vMotion on the same switch. A dedicated storage-only switch would require a third set of uplinks, which adds unnecessary complexity and does not use the two-switch design efficiently.

References

Broadcom TechDocs– Network Fabric Detailed Design – Defines ESX Infrastructure Traffic (Management, vMotion, vSAN) and NSX Host/Edge TEP traffic types with separate VLAN requirements

Explanation:

Why Option C is Correct
Performance as a design quality describes the system's ability to handle specific workload volumes, transaction rates, or concurrent operations within acceptable response times.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – Manageability
Manageability refers to the ease of operating, monitoring, and administering the environment. Requirements related to automation, logging, alerting, patching, or single-pane-of-glass interfaces would be classified as manageability. The stated requirements (50,000 concurrent workloads, 10 concurrent deployments) are numeric capacity targets, not operational ease targets.

Option B – Recoverability
Recoverability refers to the system's ability to resume operation after failure. RTO, RPO, backup frequency, and disaster recovery procedures are recoverability requirements. The stated requirements do not mention data loss, failover, or recovery times.

Option D – Availability
Availability refers to uptime percentages (e.g., 99.9%, 99.99%) and tolerance against component failures. While the 50,000 workload requirement implies the environment must be up to serve them, the specific numeric values are capacity targets, not uptime percentages or failure tolerances.

References

VMware Design Framework – Design Qualities – Performance defined as "characterized by the system's ability to complete a unit of work within a given time frame"

ExamTopics 2V0-13.25 Discussion – Verified answer C for classifying concurrent workload and deployment capacity requirements

Explanation:

Why Option A is Correct
Business requirements describe high-level organizational goals, outcomes, or user-focused objectives. They are typically non-technical, value-driven, and often subjective. The statement "The solution must provide the best end-user experience" is a classic business requirement because it focuses on user satisfaction and organizational value rather than a specific technical implementation.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option B – The solution must allow the migration of legacy server infrastructure.
This is a technical requirement or functional requirement. It specifies a concrete technical activity (migration of legacy servers) without linking directly to a business outcome.

Option C – The solution must consider security and resiliency to ensure business continuity.
This is a constraint or architectural requirement. It imposes guardrails on the solution design (security and resiliency) and ties to business continuity, but it is still expressed as a design directive rather than a business goal.

Option D – The solution must provide a component-level SLA of 99.9% or higher.
This is a service-level requirement or technical requirement. It specifies a measurable, technical availability target for infrastructure components, not a business outcome or user experience goal.

References

VMware Design Framework – Business vs Technical Requirements – Business requirements describe stakeholder needs and organizational outcomes; technical requirements specify how the solution implements them

Explanation:

Why Option B is Correct
A constraint is a fixed limitation or boundary imposed on the solution that restricts the architect's freedom of choice. The statement "all new host server hardware must be deployed using our selected hardware vendor and server model" is a classic constraint because it:

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – An assumption
An assumption is something believed to be true without proof, such as "the hardware vendor will deliver servers within 4 weeks" or "the existing network has sufficient capacity." This statement is a stated policy, not an unverified belief.

Option C – A requirement
A requirement is a capability or condition the solution must meet, such as "the solution must support 50,000 VMs" or "the solution must encrypt all data at rest." While a constraint could be considered a type of requirement, in VMware design methodology, constraints are a separate category. The distinction is that requirements describe what the solution must do, while constraints describe how or with what it must be built. Specifying a specific hardware vendor and model is a design limitation, not a functional or non-functional requirement.

Option D – A risk
A risk is an uncertain event that may negatively impact the project if it occurs, such as "the selected hardware vendor may discontinue the server model during the project." This statement is a certainty (policy requirement), not an uncertainty.

References

VMware Design Framework – Constraints – Constraints are fixed boundaries limiting design freedom, such as hardware standards, compliance mandates, or budget caps

ExamTopics 2V0-13.25 Discussion – Verified answer B for statements specifying mandatory hardware vendor/model

Explanation:

Why Option D is Correct
A conceptual model describes the solution at a high level using business-relevant terminology, focusing on what the solution does rather than how it is technically implemented. It avoids low-level configuration details and speaks to architects and stakeholders in understandable terms.

Option D describes a logical relationship (users → application servers → load balancer) using product names without implementation specifics. This fits the conceptual model.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option A – The solution must meet a Mean Time To Recovery (MTTR) of 6 hours.
This is a service-level requirement or metric, not a model statement. MTTR appears in requirements documentation but does not describe system components or their relationships.

Option B – Sites A and B will each have a stretched Layer-2 for their management network.
This enters logical design territory. It specifies network layering (Layer-2) and site topology, which is more detailed than a conceptual model typically includes.

Option C – The das.isolation shut down timeout setting will be configured to 120 seconds.
This is a physical/implementation design detail. It references an exact vSphere advanced parameter and numeric value, far too granular for a conceptual model.

References

VMware Design Framework – Architecture Models – Conceptual model = high-level components and relationships; Logical model = technology decisions; Physical model = specific configurations

Explanation:

Why Option A is Correct
BGP uses the AS_PATH attribute as its primary loop prevention mechanism. When a BGP router receives an update, it checks the AS_PATH to see if it contains its own AS number. If it finds its own AS, the router correctly assumes a routing loop and discards the advertisement.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

B. Configure edge datapath interface to transport only TEP traffic
This is a virtual networking detail. The TEP interface handles overlay traffic between hosts and is unrelated to BGP loop prevention or route advertisements to the physical network .

C. Use iBGP as the routing protocol between the Tier-0 gateway and the physical network
While possible, iBGP does not inherently solve the loop detection issue. iBGP requires a full mesh or route reflectors and does not change the AS_PATH loop detection logic. The problem described is specific to AS number collision, not iBGP vs eBGP selection .

D. Adjust the default BGP timers
Timers (keepalive, hold time) affect convergence speed and neighbor stability. They do not influence the BGP loop prevention mechanism, which operates on the AS_PATH attribute regardless of timer values.

References

ExamTopics 2V0-13.25 Discussion – Verified answer: unique private AS for Tier-0 Gateway to prevent BGP loop detection drops

Broadcom TechDocs – NSX BGP Configuration – Supports per-Tier-0 and per-VRF unique AS numbers for multi-tenancy

Explanation:

Option A – A requirement to have 99.99% availability uptime measured at the front-end application layer.
This directly translates the "24×7×365 website availability" objective into a measurable requirement at the user-facing layer. It is appropriately placed in the conceptual model because it states what is needed (99.99% at front-end) without specifying how (load balancers, clusters, etc.).

Option B – A risk that the external internet network provider does not meet the SLA requirements.
The business depends on external internet connectivity for customer access. The provider failing to meet SLAs would directly impact both availability and shopping experience. This is a valid conceptual risk captured during workshops.

Option F – An assumption that there is sufficient budget for the design to meet the performance requirements.
Achieving optimal end-to-end shopping experience requires adequate investment in compute, storage, networking, and load balancing. Assuming sufficient budget exists is a legitimate conceptual assumption; if false, the project may fail to meet the performance objective.

Why Other Options are Incorrect

Option C – A requirement to have 99.99% availability measured at the network infrastructure layer.
This is overly specific for a conceptual model. It specifies a particular infrastructure layer (network) before analysis determines where availability matters most. The business cares about website availability, not network infrastructure metrics as an end in themselves.

Option D – An assumption that site performance is not a KPI for the customer.
This directly contradicts the stated business objective prioritizing "optimal end-to-end user shopping experience." An assumption cannot contradict a confirmed business objective.

Option E – A constraint of any planned changes limited to outside business hours only.
While a valid constraint, it relates to maintenance windows, not directly to the two stated business objectives. It also introduces implementation detail (change windows) better suited to logical or physical design phases.

References

ExamTopics 2V0-13.25 Discussion – Verified consensus for A, B, F

VMware Design Framework – Conceptual Model – Requirements, risks, assumptions, and constraints at business level